Delayed acquisition of neonatal reflexes in newborn primates receiving a thimerosal-containing Hepatitis B vaccine: Influence of gestational age and birth weight
The Evaluation of Costers, Peer-Reviewed Studies.
From the Argus leader online, Sioux falls SD., Article link below. His entire in relation to, posted comment is below, at the bottom of the page; dated 2/15/2010 8:30:06 AM.
http://www.argusleader.com/article/20100203/NEWS/2030302/Study-linking-vaccines-autism-a-sham
32 peer-reviewed papers since 1998.
http://www.thoughtfulhouse.org/publications.php
Laura Hewitson a,c,*, Lisa A. Houser a, Carol Stott c, Gene Sackett b, Jaime L. Tomko a, David Atwood d, Lisa Blue d, E. Railey White d, Andrew J. Wakefield c
http://fourteenstudies.org/pdf/primates_hep_b.pdf
No Parent Ever Complained to GMC: Public Statement from Lancet Families Supports The MMR3.
http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/02/no-parent-ever-complained-to-gmc-public-statement-from-lancet-families-supports-the-mmr3.html
Wakefield Inquisitioners Have Their Day. A very good summary of the situation, by Dr Sherri Tenpenny.
http://drtenpenny.com/Wakefield_Inquisitioners_Have_their_day.aspx
Here is another similar and good summary by Generation Rescue's , Jim and Jenny McCarthy; but they, the sheeple, would rather just bash the credibility of these two people, than to ever address any of the real information.
http://www.generationrescue.org/autism/17-studies-against-vaccine-autism.htm
Go to my The Vaccine Science page for 100's of Peer-reviewed studies in realtion to all areas of studied vaccine harm. Studies that show direct conflict with that main stream claim that there studies have conlusive proof that vaccines do not cause autism nor any other vaccine harm, "safe and effective." With what you see on this site, does that look to be the case? It was intended to be over-whelming, as nothing less will work for so many people, and nothing is enough proof.
----------------------
My personal analysis of those studies follows, as well as some research links to information where others have done as well an in depth analysis of those claimed peer reviewed main stream studies they always tout and use. So is pharma a good peer review board, and their directly connected medical trade organizations? Like the fox running from the chicken house, or the robbery suspect investigating his own crime? To much to lose; be it the truth be known! These are children we are talking about here!
Here below are Costners studies that he listed. That when the article itself was about the MMR vaccine, and Dr. Wakelfield issue. Noone was even talking about thimerosal; but so be it, it ties into Wakefield new studies. Dr. Wakefield's studies have not since 1998, been nor are they exclusively and only about thimersol. Nor will be the ones he and his partners are working on currently.
Here is how he titled these studies.
Autism studies: "Eight major studies (as of 2008) examined the effect of reductions or removal of thimerosal from vaccines. All eight demonstrated that autism rates failed to decline despite removal of thimerosal, arguing strongly against a causative role."
1. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/13/1281 A New england Journal of Medicine study.
Results Among the 42 neuropsychological outcomes, we detected only a few significant associations with exposure to mercury from thimerosal. The detected associations were small and almost equally divided between positive and negative effects. Higher prenatal mercury exposure was associated with better performance on one measure of language and poorer performance on one measure of attention and executive functioning. Increasing levels of mercury exposure from birth to 7 months were associated with better performance on one measure of fine motor coordination and on one measure of attention and executive functioning. Increasing mercury exposure from birth to 28 days was associated with poorer performance on one measure of speech articulation and better performance on one measure of fine motor coordination.
Conclusions Our study does not support a causal association between early exposure to mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines and immune globulins and deficits in neuropsychological functioning at the age of 7 to 10 years.
2. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/114/3/577
An Academy of Pediatrics study, where they tried to claim mercury, (thimersol) injected into an infant actually acted inversely, (the opposite- it improved the outcomes), in regard to hyperactivity, conduct, motor skills and development, and as well as affect on hearing and speech development. Conclusion, we find no conclusive evidence to support that early exposure to thimersol, had any deletrious affect on neurological or physiological outcome.
My recommended studies below, as pertain to the above study.
Mercury Poisoning, Nervous System
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68020262?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Mesh.Mesh_ResultsPanel.Mesh_RVDocSum
A comprehensive review of mercury provoked autism..
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_SingleItemSupl.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=4&log$=relatedreviews&logdbfrom=pubmed
Analysis of Thimersol
http://www.novaccine.com/vaccine-ingredients/results.asp?sc=29
http://www.novaccine.com/vaccine-ingredients/results.asp?sc=29
3. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/112/3/604
My take on that study.
Another AAP study, supporting the Denmark study, where claim was made that autism rates when up when thimersol was discontinued. This suggests another main factor; how about the adjuvant replacement increases in aluminum? Mercury does act a as an adjuvant; it is a heavy metal; it is know as part of the adjuvant. As well, we know that these vaccines, and all the ingredients, work to cause harm, in many ways. If you want a good analysis of that go here. www.drcarley.com Read the section titled, Vaccines The True Weapons of Mass Destruction. realize that that information has been put before the CDC, and they have refused to offer a rebuttal or respond!!! what did they do to Dr.Rebecca Carley? They falsey smeared her, just like Wakefield, in a New York closed licensing board room; no other doctor could testify to the good, nor was allowed in.
Vaccines and immune Supression.
http://www.mercola.com/article/vaccines/immune_suppression.htm
Here is a better analysis of that above study.
Something Rotten in Denmark.
http://www.safeminds.org/research/commentary.html
Studies Against Vaccines & Autism Relationship with Rebuttals
http://www.generationrescue.org/autism/17-studies-against-vaccine-autism.htm
http://www.safeminds.org/news/pressroom/press_releases/20040518_AutismAuthorsNetwork.pdf
MMR and Autism in Perspective: the Denmark Story.
http://www.safeminds.org/research/Stott_et_al.pdf
4. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/290/13/1763
Results During 2 986 654 person-years, we identified 440 autism cases and 787 cases of other autistic-spectrum disorders. The risk of autism and other autistic-spectrum disorders did not differ significantly between children vaccinated with thimerosal-containing vaccine and children vaccinated with thimerosal-free vaccine.
Conclusion The results do not support a causal relationship between childhood vaccination with thimerosal-containing vaccines and development of autistic-spectrum disorders.
Analysis what 2 986 654 person-years is, I am not sure; but all it is again-is an analysis of the said Denmark study.
5. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/114/3/584
Another AAP study.
Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed using 109 863 children who were born from 1988 to 1997 and were registered in general practices in the United Kingdom.
Analysis.
The United Kingdom, of all places? This analysis is only up to 4 months of age. If you actually read that study, they did find statistically significant affects on in developmental disorders, developmental delay, and well as in attention deficiet disorder, with increases in injected thimersol, after 4 months of age. Yet they concluded, there was no significant evidence found? Then they went to the Simpson Wood Conference, and covered it all up!
Dr Russsell Blaylock, The Truth Behind The Vaccine Cover-up.
http://www.generationrescue.org/blaylock/Truth-behind-vaccine-cover-up.pdf
6. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/e139
Analysis.
This study was a survey with some additional background research into the outcomes of 27749 children between 1987-1998 where they claim a 21.6 to per 10,000 ASD figure. The current US figure is 1-100. In the study they claim that pervasive development disorder actually increased 23% in thimersol free chorts; and just how did they confirm all those children had thimersol free shots? Especially when we know it is still in there even if it is thimersol reduced or claimed a free form. Used and manuafcturing and later claimed removed. Just like the other study (2.) claiming thimersol to be good for kids, and increases milestone acheivement. Then they as well claimed that ASD and the rate of development disorders went down when the children recieved the MMR vaccines. (In other words, proving toxic injected poison, is good for you and your child. What a good deal)!
7. http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/65/1/19
Analysis.
A 2007 AGP study on trends in autism, with the claim that autism has went up not down, since the claimed removal of thimersol; however thimersol does remain in the flu vaccines for children. Again, what level of thimersol, even trace amounts is safe; from manufacturing? This study only points to the predominate cause of vaccine damage not exclusively being thimersol; thimersol, is only part of the problem.
8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12880876
This study again only addresses the Denmark and Sweden population studies, already address previously. Those studies have been analysed and debunked for significance, more times than any other.
http://www.safeminds.org/research/commentary.html
http://www.generationrescue.org/autism/17-studies-against-vaccine-autism.htm
http://www.14studies.org/
http://www.14studies.org/studies.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The post made.
Costner wrote: