Part One: The Phenomenon of Immunity.
If you want an explaination of why man can NOT improve on the human bodies immune function...and by use of vaccines...go HERE! Playing the part of the creator, God! Not happening; never has worked nor ever will. The lie has gone on for to long! The misinformation has gone on for far to long.
Excerpts:
We come now to a beginner's question, one seldom or never asked in the science of immunology. It is, why does our immune system work in such an inconsistent way, providing for permanent immunity from recurrence only after certain illnesses and not after others? A "why" question such as this is usually considered irrelevant in modern science, while the equivalent "how" question is actively pursued. In the case of immunity to illness, it is the "how" questions that have led science to the idea and the practice of vaccination.
For science the pertinent question is, how can we imitate nature and bring about lifelong immunity to an infectious-inflammatory illness, but without having to experience the illness first? The first task would be to learn exactly how nature itself manages to maintain permanent immunity in us after a first experience of illness. What is this process of lifelong maintenance of resistance to a particular illness? Can science duplicate it?
Article link: These may not be navigable precisely from these links, but you can get to the page from there.
-----------
Part Two: How do vaccinations work?
Excerpts:
We come now to a beginner's question, one seldom or never asked in the science of immunology. It is, why does our immune system work in such an inconsistent way, providing for permanent immunity from recurrence only after certain illnesses and not after others? A "why" question such as this is usually considered irrelevant in modern science, while the equivalent "how" question is actively pursued. In the case of immunity to illness, it is the "how" questions that have led science to the idea and the practice of vaccination.
For science the pertinent question is, how can we imitate nature and bring about lifelong immunity to an infectious-inflammatory illness, but without having to experience the illness first? The first task would be to learn exactly how nature itself manages to maintain permanent immunity in us after a first experience of illness. What is this process of lifelong maintenance of resistance to a particular illness? Can science duplicate it?
Full article here.
-----------
Part One Additional: The Phenomenon of Immunity
Excerpts:
Having successfully passed the challenge of a particular illness, we may not need to experience it again. Something about the illness and our response to it has made us immune to its recurrence. If we knew what that something was, perhaps we could learn how to use it to create health and prevent illness. Of course, this is the basic concept of vaccination, but the all-important question is, does vaccination accomplish what we think it does?
We've already suggested that it's probably the cellular immune system, and not antibodies, which protect us against illness. Surely antibodies can have no role in either preventing or overcoming first bouts of infectious-inflammatory illness, because they are formed only after the illness has peaked. It must be the cellular immune system which confers the resistance to, as well as the capacity to overcome, both first episodes and subsequent episodes of infectious disease. To understand how this might happen, it is helpful to examine more closely the very illness and its vaccination which started the whole debate: smallpox.
Full article here:
-----------
Part Three: Smallpox And Its Vaccination.
Excerpts:
In the same way, science bestows antibodies through vaccination and mistakenly assumes that it is bestowing the immune strength that can only be developed through the experience of illness. In equating the significance of vaccine-induced antibodies with that of illness-induced antibodies, science confuses the outer sign of the battle experience with the experience itself. Antibodies arising through illness are markers of immunity and (unlike the medals in our battle metaphor) also contribute to immunity, but antibodies alone are not sufficient to confer lasting immunity to a particular illness. There are several diseases which may recur repeatedly, such as herpes outbreaks, despite high antibody levels. The evidence suggests that it is our cellular immune system which confers lasting immunity, with antibodies playing a secondary role in the process.
This active process of acquiring mastery cannot be replaced by a vaccination unless the host's immune response to the vaccination is essentially identical to its response to the illness itself, even though reduced in intensity. This would mean that in order to produce genuine cellular immunity, a vaccination would have to reproduce the experience of the illness, causing some of the same signs and symptoms, though milder, that are caused by the illness. To see if this is true, let us look at smallpox vaccination
Ian Sinclair, writing on the history of smallpox, states:
"After an intensive four-year effort to vaccinate the entire population between the ages of 2 and 50, the Chief Medical Officer of England announced in May 1871 that 97.5% had been vaccinated. In the following year, 1872, England experienced its worst ever smallpox epidemic which claimed 44,840 lives..In the Philippines, prior to U.S. takeover in 1905, case mortality [death rate] from smallpox was about 10%..In 1918-1919, with over 95% of the population vaccinated, the worst epidemic in the Philippines' history occurred resulting in a case mortality of 65%..The 1920 Report of the Philippines Health Service [stated] . 'hundreds of thousands of people were yearly vaccinated with the most unfortunate result that the 1918 epidemic looks prima facie as a flagrant failure of the classic immunization toward future epidemics.'"4
The disease smallpox and its vaccination are fruitful subjects to study in order to understand how the immune system works, because we can observe what happens on the skin as vital clues to what might be happening inside the body. The main lesson from this study is the exceedingly important fact that a lack of a vaccine reaction, and by extension a lack of illness symptoms, can by no means be taken as a sign of immunity or of health.
The other critical fact confirmed by our historical experience with smallpox vaccination is that individual differences in response to vaccination are extremely important. One size most definitely does not fit all. It is clear that although the smallpox vaccine was effective in conferring a temporary immunity in some individuals, an unknown number of other individuals were probably harmed by the vaccine. With the smallpox vaccination the adverse effects were fairly obvious, they often appeared on the skin. With other vaccines in use today the adverse effects may not be so obvious. We've seen with smallpox that the same vaccination procedure which temporarily strengthened the cellular immune system in some individuals probably weakened it in others, especially upon repeated revaccination.
The possibility, that the up to 39 doses of 12 different vaccines which children today receive by school entry may be impacting the cellular immune systems of many individual children in a negative way, suggests itself to the open mind. Science has most of the knowledge and the tools it needs to investigate and to find answers to these unanswered questions. All it needs now is the will. May it come soon, for our children's sake.
Full article here.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Vaccine Insanity, and Why it is!
USA Today.
1983 vaccine schedule (10 vaccines). Title: Are we poisioning our kids in the name of protecting health?
Autism rate in 1983, 1 in 10,000. 2009, 1 in 150; new figures in 2009, 1 in 100.
Comparison of the 1983 vaccine schedule verses that in 2008.
Sandra Duffy, The Oregonian's Community Writers »
Pediatricians against free speech?
The history of Thimersol use, (scroll down on the article).
Jenny McCarthy, Andrew Wakefield and Generation Rescue Continue the MMR/Autism Debate.
Dr Rebecca Carley. Who has a different opinion on mercury and autism; and I agree it is not just the thimerosal causing autism and neurological damage. However, I believe due to the recovery protocols that have worked, it is clearly part of it.
Fluoride Action Network.
---------
USA Today.
A 6000% increase in autism, wouldn't you try to cover it up to?
Its time for the CDC to come clean with the American public
---------
Autism is preventable and reversable.
Biomedical treatment
Autism recovery page, with videos.
Dr Buttars 5 year old autsm recovered son testifies before congress. Click on also CBS report. Also go to the videos he has about the NC medical licensing boards harrassement of him; (on my site) and those videos are as well on Youtube.com and Google videos.
---------
New York Times
Mercury poisoning and autism, it isnt a coincdence.
--------
New york Times
Baxter, Recovery.
--------
Government Again Concedes Vaccines Cause Autism
Mysterious Vaccine Court created in 1986 by the pharmaceutical industry, with the support of Congress, rules in favor of Bailey Banks against HHS.
And what did they do since that time? Find every false way possible, to deny it!
---------
Scientific vaccine studies - (on harm).
The 14 Studies. (Evaluation of the mainstream studies).
--------
Autism Mercury Link . com
-------
Moms Against Mercury.
How Mercury Causes Brain Neuron Degeneration.
University of Calgary, Facilty of Medicine, Dept. of Physiology & Biophysics
Same video as above.
SHOULD YOU GET THE FLU SHOT?
By RFD Columnist, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny,
Cervarix - An Injection of the Truth ...
-------------------
List of Good websites:
--------
Reporting Vaccine and Vaccine Registry Harassment, Discrimination and Coercion Incidents.
--------
When your doctor won't report a vaccine reaction...you should know that Federal law requires doctors or other health care professionals who give vaccines to:
--------
Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Policy Making
Majority Staff Report
Committee on Government Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
June 15, 2000
Proof of the Corruption!
Excerpts:
Section I
Introduction
In August 1999, the Committee on Government Reform initiated an investigation into Federal vaccine policy. Over the last six months, this investigation has focused on possible conflicts of interest on the part of Federal policy-makers. Committee staff has conducted an extensive review of financial disclosure forms and related documents, and interviewed key officials from the Department of Health and Human Services, including the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
This staff report focuses on two influential advisory committees utilized by Federal regulators to provide expert advice on vaccine policy:
1. The FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC); and
2. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices (ACIP).
The VRBPAC advises the FDA on the licensing of new vaccines, while the ACIP advises the CDC on guidelines to be issued to doctors and the states for the appropriate use of vaccines.
Members of the advisory committees are required to disclose any financial conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from participating in decisions in which they have an interest. The Committee's investigation has determined that conflict of interest rules employed by the FDA and the CDC have been weak, enforcement has been lax, and committee members with substantial ties to pharmaceutical companies have been given waivers to participate in committee proceedings. Among the specific problems identified in this staff report:
The CDC routinely grants waivers from conflict of interest rules to every member of its advisory committee.
CDC Advisory Committee members who are not allowed to vote on certain recommendations due to financial conflicts of interest are allowed to participate in committee deliberations and advocate specific positions.
The Chairman of the CDC's advisory committee until very recently owned 600 shares of stock in Merck, a pharmaceutical company with an active vaccine division.
Members of the CDC's advisory Committee often fill out incomplete financial disclosure statements, and are not required to provide the missing information by CDC ethics officials.
Four out of eight CDC advisory committee members who voted to approve guidelines for the rotavirus vaccine in June 1998 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine.
3 out of 5 FDA advisory committee members who voted to approve the rotavirus vaccine in December 1997 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine.
A more complete discussion of specific conflict of interest problems identified by Government Reform Committee staff can be found in Sections 4 and 5 of this report. To provide focus to the discussion, this report examines the deliberations of the two committees on one specific vaccine -- the Rotavirus vaccine. Approved for use by the FDA on August 31, 1998, the Rotavirus vaccine was pulled from the market 13 months later after serious adverse reactions to the vaccine emerged. Financial disclosure forms and waivers granted to committee members who participated in these meetings were analyzed, along with their votes and actions taken during the meetings.
Read full document here.
-----------
For Immediate Release:
Contact: Sean M. Spicer
23 August 2000
(202) 225-5074
Burton Critical of Vaccine Approval Process.
Staff Report Details FDA and CDC Conflicts in Approval of Controversial Rotavirus Vaccine
----------
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc.
A Voice for Private Physicians Since 1943.
Health care reform Myths Exposed.
Sham Peer Review, what the REAL Physicians say! (SO MUCH FOR THEIR PRIDE AN JOY "Scientific Method")!!!
Vaccinations Page.
----------
Another vaccine ingredients list.
--------
Former head of CDC lands lucrative job as president of Merck vaccine division.
http://www.naturalnews.com/027789_Dr_Julie_Gerberding_Merck.html
Natural News - Vaccine Articles.
Natural News - Links to 300 articles on vaccines.
Natural News - Gardasil Articles.
http://www.naturalnews.com/GoogleSearchResults.html?q=gardasil&cx=010579349100583850635:w_kzwe9_yca&cof=FORID:11&ie=UTF-8&sa.x=0&sa.y=0&sa=Search&siteurl=www.naturalnews.com%252F
Expert Pediatrician Exposes Vaccine Myths.
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
November 14 2009 | 181,601 views
Flu Vaccine Exposed
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
September 26 2009 | 285,679 views
Very Important Vaccine Question, (scroll down on the page).
The Truth Behind the Vaccine Coverup
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
The Danger of Excessive Vaccination During Brain Development
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
The Dangers of Excessive Childhood Vaccinations.
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
Flu Vaccine Harm - Numerous articles. Dr. Mercola.
The Real Truth Behind Flu Shots.
Flu Vaccine Warning For Pregnant Women
Do NOT Let Your Child Get Flu Vaccine -- 9 Reasons Why
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
October 06 2009 | 539,374 views
The Truth About the Flu Shot. (Cochrane Studies).
Danger lurking in flu shots.
THE NARROW SCOPE OF FLU VACCINE USEFULNESS
Vaccine Safety and Benefits Not Scientifically Proven.
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
Twenty reasons why vitamin D is better than a swine flu vaccine.
NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM OUT OF CONTROL
Voice Of Truth - Casting Crowns. A song about Goliath.
Links to other websites:
Saturday, 20 June 2009 09:42
The Shocking Truth about How Food is Produced.
Improve School Foods. (Sign the petition).
Food Incorporated Movie
Trailer:
Food Inc. - DVD.
Sustainable table.
Why Grassfed is Best.
The Health Benefits of Grassfed Animal Products.
Processed Food and Low-Fat Diets
------------------
11th Report on Carcinogens.
Chemicals Known to the state of California to cause cancer or reproductive harm.